<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hiking near, and on, a frozen Lake Griffy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apertome.com/blog/2008/01/28/hiking-near-and-on-a-frozen-lake-griffy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apertome.com/blog/2008/01/28/hiking-near-and-on-a-frozen-lake-griffy/</link>
	<description>Cycling, hiking, camping, etc -- now back in southern Indiana. Words and photos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apertome</title>
		<link>http://www.apertome.com/blog/2008/01/28/hiking-near-and-on-a-frozen-lake-griffy/comment-page-1/#comment-7151</link>
		<dc:creator>Apertome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertome.com/blog/2008/01/28/hiking-near-and-on-a-frozen-lake-griffy/#comment-7151</guid>
		<description>As far as I know there&#039;s no such thing as a C41 process slide film. The cross-processed shots I&#039;ve done all used E6 film, processed as C41 and printed. I either have them scan the negatives, or I scan the prints or negatives myself. I get great results when I have my local camera shop do the scanning; decent when I do it; crummy when CVS does it, but that&#039;s cheaper than the camera shop and allows me to be lazy about it, or get things processed at times when the camera shop is closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know there&#8217;s no such thing as a C41 process slide film. The cross-processed shots I&#8217;ve done all used E6 film, processed as C41 and printed. I either have them scan the negatives, or I scan the prints or negatives myself. I get great results when I have my local camera shop do the scanning; decent when I do it; crummy when CVS does it, but that&#8217;s cheaper than the camera shop and allows me to be lazy about it, or get things processed at times when the camera shop is closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.apertome.com/blog/2008/01/28/hiking-near-and-on-a-frozen-lake-griffy/comment-page-1/#comment-7149</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apertome.com/blog/2008/01/28/hiking-near-and-on-a-frozen-lake-griffy/#comment-7149</guid>
		<description>I agree - these are some nice shots for an older camera.  I can sympathize with your plight of bad scanning from the drugstore photo labs.  They&#039;re cheaper but do a bad job usually.  Still, it looks like everyone had a lot of fun despite the ridiculous conditions (hiking, in snow, in winter?  Nuts, I tell ya!).  

Hey, I meant to ask you - what format of slide film were you using?  I know that you said that you cross-processed it, but did you use C-41 process slide film and just have it printed like a normal picture, or did you actually get a different process slide film and have it done (such as E6 process film)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; these are some nice shots for an older camera.  I can sympathize with your plight of bad scanning from the drugstore photo labs.  They&#8217;re cheaper but do a bad job usually.  Still, it looks like everyone had a lot of fun despite the ridiculous conditions (hiking, in snow, in winter?  Nuts, I tell ya!).  </p>
<p>Hey, I meant to ask you &#8211; what format of slide film were you using?  I know that you said that you cross-processed it, but did you use C-41 process slide film and just have it printed like a normal picture, or did you actually get a different process slide film and have it done (such as E6 process film)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
